Ms. Adichie’s idea of a single story directly points to the source of misunderstanding, humiliation, and conflict in the world. The real exercise of power in the world is not only the ability to deploy weapons; it is also the ability to reduce to "a single story" the complex narratives of those the powerful seek to defeat.
What generations of students read about the non-West - Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia - in the Western media are single stories of poverty, corruption, and brutality. And they are the students who take over leadership positions in their countries to perpetuate the domination of the West over the non-West. For non-Westerners, it is humiliating to know that the rich stories that capture their essence are simplified into mostly negative stereotypes by single stories. Without the ability to counter such reductive stories, those without the means to tell their complex stories in the non-Western world enter each competition, each negotiation with scant chances of convincing their counterparts.
Not that the non-West have not tried. Their attempts at a New International Economic Order and at a New International Communications Order were derisively dismissed in international organizations. On the other hand, the non-West, especially states in Africa, by the corruption of their leaders and other ills continue to provide justification for the single stories told about them in the West.
Again, Ms. Adichie’s idea should stimulate discussions about how to tell the multiple and complex stories of all people.
Reply to this message